Carl Jung and the Rise of the Unconscious in Modern Art

Feature image: Roberto Matta, Untitled, 1942-3, ©Roberto Matta. ADAGP, Paris / VEGAP, Madrid © Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid via Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza

In the years following the First World War, Europe entered a period of psychological rupture. Cities rebuilt themselves while social structures shifted and long-held belief systems weakened. Artists living in Paris, Berlin, and Zurich searched for new ways to express inner experience shaped by trauma, memory, and uncertainty. Traditional representation felt insufficient for a world that no longer trusted surface appearances.

During this period, psychology emerged as a serious intellectual force across Europe. One of its most influential figures was Carl Jung, who worked in Zurich and developed theories that focused on the role of images within the human psyche. Jung proposed that the unconscious communicated through dreams, visions, and spontaneous mental pictures. He treated these images as meaningful events rather than byproducts of rational thought.

Jung’s ideas reached artists through lectures, publications, and personal exchange. His belief that images carried their own authority offered a compelling framework for painters seeking freedom from descriptive representation. Art could now function as a form of psychological inquiry. Images emerged from inner necessity and demanded attention through their presence rather than explanation.

Jung believed that the unconscious communicated primarily through images. He encouraged a practice he called active imagination. This process involved allowing images to surface freely and observing them with attention and respect. Jung viewed these images as autonomous. They carried emotional force before intellectual explanation.

Another central idea in Jung’s thinking involved archetypes. These recurring symbolic forms appeared across cultures and time periods. Jung believed they connected personal experience to collective memory. For artists, this concept suggested that individual images could resonate beyond biography. Art could express something shared and enduring.

This framework offered artists a sense of trust. Inner images deserved space and patience. Meaning developed through engagement rather than control. The image itself held authority.

Surrealism emerged in Paris during the 1920s as artists sought methods that bypassed rational planning. While Surrealist writers often aligned publicly with Freudian theory, visual artists gravitated toward Jung’s image-centered approach. Jung treated images as primary experiences rather than coded messages, emphasizing collective symbols and archetypes. Clarifying how Jung's approach differs from Freud's focus on the unconscious mind can help readers understand the unique contributions of Jungian psychology to art techniques.

Max Ernst developed working methods that allowed images to reveal themselves. Frottage involved rubbing graphite across textured surfaces such as wood or fabric. Decalcomania pressed wet paint between surfaces to create unpredictable patterns. These techniques removed conscious composition from the process.

Ernst approached the resulting forms with patience. He studied them until figures, landscapes, and symbols emerged. This process closely mirrors Jung’s active imagination. The artist responded to what appeared rather than deciding what should exist. Image came first. Meaning followed.

Ernst described this method as a form of discovery rather than invention. Jung’s psychology gave intellectual support to this approach. Images held value through their persistence and emotional intensity.

Other Surrealists explored Jungian ideas through repetition and symbolic vocabulary. Joan Miró developed a visual language composed of recurring signs, floating shapes, and biomorphic figures. His paintings resist fixed interpretation. Forms appear playful yet deliberate. They return across decades with subtle variation.

Miró treated painting as a physical and mental state. His symbols resemble psychic markers rather than descriptive objects. Jung’s ideas help explain this approach. Symbols function as living forms shaped by instinct and memory. They remain open and flexible. 

Roberto Matta engaged Jung’s ideas more directly than many of his peers. Matta studied architecture before turning to painting. He combined spatial thinking with psychological inquiry. He described his works as inscape, visualizations of inner mental states.

A clear example appears in Psychological Morphology from the late 1930s. The painting presents a vast interior space filled with floating planes, luminous forms, and shifting perspectives. No fixed horizon exists. Forms appear suspended in a dynamic field. The space feels mental rather than physical.

This work reflects Jung’s belief that the psyche contains structure and movement. The painting reads as a map of internal experience. Forms interact without narrative. Energy flows through space. Matta treated the canvas as a site where unconscious material could organize itself visually.

Jung’s influence is evident in Matta's trust in spatial intuition. The painting unfolds through exploration rather than design. Viewers move through the image as they would through a mental landscape. The work offers experience rather than explanation.

By the late 1930s, Jungian ideas reached American artists through exhibitions, publications, and personal contact with European Surrealists. These ideas resonated strongly in a postwar environment shaped by anxiety and transformation.

Jackson Pollock encountered Jung’s writings during a formative period. Pollock became interested in myth, ritual, and archetypal imagery. Early paintings feature symbolic figures drawn from ancient sources.

As Pollock’s work evolved, recognizable imagery disappeared. The psychological foundation remained present. Drip painting functioned as an embodied process shaped by rhythm and repetition. Painting recorded a state of engagement rather than a planned image. Jung’s emphasis on inner necessity aligns closely with this method.

Pollock’s work demonstrates how Jungian ideas could survive without symbolic imagery. The unconscious expressed itself through movement, scale, and duration.

Jung’s influence reshaped how artists understood the studio's function. The studio shifted from a site of production to a site of encounter. Artists entered the space with attention rather than expectation. The goal centered on engagement with images as they emerged through work.

Many artists returned to the same gestures, materials, and formats over extended periods. Repetition allowed images to evolve through familiarity. Subtle changes gained significance through time and focus. This process favored depth over variation.

The studio also offered separation from external demands. It created conditions for sustained concentration. Inner images surfaced through rhythm, movement, and duration. Artists responded through action rather than interpretation.

This understanding of the studio continues to influence contemporary creative practice. Across painting, music, and writing, artists describe creativity as a process of receptivity shaped by time and attention rather than speed or output.

Jung’s ideas remain relevant as artists navigate a culture shaped by speed and visibility. His work suggests that images arrive with their own authority and timing. They ask for attention rather than explanation. Modern art began this conversation through Surrealism and extended it through abstraction. The next evolution lies in how artists continue to treat inner experience as an active source of form. This approach preserves depth while allowing new visual languages to emerge through sustained engagement.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2026. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.