The Modernism Network Around Mondrian and His Circle

Feature image: Friedrich Vordemberge-Gildewart, Composition No. 142, 1943 via The Guggenheim

Paris in the mid-1920s functioned as a central laboratory for modernism, where artists from across Europe gathered to exchange ideas and define new visual languages. The aftermath of the First World War reshaped intellectual life, and abstraction emerged as a method for establishing order and clarity. Within this environment, Piet Mondrian developed a visual system based on vertical and horizontal relationships, positioning himself at the center of a growing international discourse.

Before these artists met in Paris, several had already begun shaping abstraction within their own contexts. In the early 1920s, Enrico Prampolini developed Futurist stage designs that treated space as an active system. His environments used layered planes, light, and movement to construct dynamic spatial experiences that extended visual composition into performance.

At the same time, Lucia Moholy began working at the Bauhaus in 1923, documenting architecture and design through photography. Her images emphasized proportion, structure, and clarity, translating architectural space into visual form. These early developments positioned both theatre and photography within the expanding field of abstraction before direct contact with Mondrian’s circle.

In 1924, Michel Seuphor began organizing critical writing on abstract art, establishing a shared discourse across Europe. His work connected artists working in different cities and provided a framework for understanding non-figurative painting as a unified intellectual project. Through correspondence and publication, he contributed to the circulation of ideas that would later define geometric abstraction.

During this same period, Félix del Marle, associated with the Vouloir group in Lille, developed a rhythmic approach to geometric abstraction. His paintings used repetition and shifting structures to create movement within ordered compositions. Through his contributions to journals, he linked regional activity in northern France to developments in Paris.

By 1925, Paris became a point of direct convergence. Piet Mondrian, working from his studio on Rue du Départ, had established himself as a leading figure in De Stijl. His studio functioned as a constructed environment, where walls and objects reflected the same geometric order as his paintings. Visitors encountered a complete system in which abstraction extended beyond the canvas.

In February 1925, the exhibition L’Art d’aujourd’hui brought together artists from Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Britain, and the United States. This exhibition created direct contact between practitioners working across disciplines. Piet Mondrian encountered Enrico Prampolini and Michel Seuphor, whose approaches expanded the conversation beyond the strict geometry of De Stijl.

Around this time, Winifred Nicholson and Ben Nicholson traveled to Paris and encountered abstraction firsthand. Winifred Nicholson continued to explore light and domestic interiors, organizing space through color relationships. Ben Nicholson began reducing forms into simplified compositions, developing an approach grounded in balance and proportion.

Following this moment of convergence, abstraction expanded into new materials and spatial formats. By 1926 and 1927, César Domela produced relief constructions that extended geometric composition into three-dimensional space. Using metal, wood, and painted surfaces, his works projected outward from the wall and aligned abstraction with architectural thinking.

During the same period, Florence Henri, after studying with Fernand Léger, began producing photographic compositions around 1927. Her works used mirrors, glass spheres, and reflective surfaces to construct layered spatial environments. These compositions fragmented and reassembled space, positioning photography within the structural concerns of abstraction.

German artists Friedrich Vordemberge-Gildewart and Willi Baumeister contributed further developments during the mid to late 1920s. Vordemberge-Gildewart exhibited compositions based on precise proportional systems, closely aligned with De Stijl principles. Baumeister developed textured works such as his late 1920s Mauerbilder, emphasizing surface, layering, and material presence. His approach introduced a tactile dimension to geometric abstraction.

Between 1924 and 1927, exhibitions, journals, and personal encounters formed a network in which abstraction developed through exchange across media and national contexts. Piet Mondrian refined his grid-based compositions during these years, reducing visual language to essential vertical and horizontal relationships.

Around him, artists extended abstraction into theatre, photography, relief construction, and material experimentation. These developments occurred simultaneously, with each artist contributing a distinct approach. The network operated through proximity and communication, allowing ideas to move between practices without requiring uniformity.

By the end of the decade, these exchanges began to take on more formal structures. In 1929, Michel Seuphor founded Cercle et Carré, bringing together artists committed to geometric abstraction and consolidating many of the connections established earlier in the decade. This initiative marked a transition from informal exchange to organized presentation.

The impact of these earlier encounters continued into the next decade. Ben Nicholson developed relief constructions in the early 1930s, translating geometric composition into carved surfaces. The work of César Domela, Florence Henri, and Lucia Moholy continued to influence the relationship between painting, photography, and architecture, reinforcing abstraction as a practice that moved across media.

The network that formed around Mondrian during the mid-1920s reveals a sequence of developments shaped through timing, proximity, and exchange. Each artist entered the conversation at a specific moment, introducing new materials, methods, and spatial ideas that expanded the possibilities of abstraction.

This sequence presents a model of artistic development grounded in circulation. Ideas move through exhibitions, publications, and encounters, taking on new forms as they pass between artists and disciplines. Within this framework, abstraction continues to evolve through connection, adaptation, and transformation.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2026. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.