Why Artists Remain Obsessed with Faces in Painting

Feature image: Gustave Courbet, The Desperate Man, 1843–45 via Wikimedia Commons

When people think of faces in art, the same examples often come to mind: Leonardo’s Mona Lisa, Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring, and Munch’s The Scream. These works are powerful, but they have become shorthand for portraiture itself. Yet the history of painting is filled with less familiar faces that are just as striking and significant. From funerary portraits in ancient Egypt to radical distortions in the twentieth century, artists have always returned to the face as their most compelling subject. By looking beyond the most famous examples, we uncover a richer story about why artists are obsessed with painting faces.

In Roman Egypt, painters created remarkable panel portraits for the dead. One example is the Fayum Portrait of a Woman with a Blue Mantle from the second century, which shows how early artists transformed the face into a vessel of identity. Her wide, dark eyes meet ours across centuries with a piercing presence. Painted in encaustic on wood, the portrait preserved individuality in the face of mortality. These works are not masks but living likenesses, designed to connect the departed with the living. They remind us that the obsession with the face began with the human need to preserve memories.

During the Renaissance, portraits flourished as markers of power and presence. A masterful example is Bronzino’s Portrait of Eleonora di Toledo with Her Son Giovanni, painted in 1545. Eleonora’s face appears smooth, pale, and serene, like porcelain. She gazes directly ahead, her expression composed and almost mask-like. Bronzino’s precision heightens the impression of wealth and control. The face here is not an intimate revelation but a crafted image of dynastic power. Through portraiture, the Medici family projected a sense of stability and authority.

El Greco’s Nobleman with His Hand on His Chest, painted around 1580, shows a very different approach. The elongated face, large eyes, and solemn expression create an aura of spiritual gravity. The work abandons naturalism for heightened emotion, showing how the face could serve as a mirror of inner devotion. Unlike Bronzino’s serene mask, El Greco’s sitter appears restless and charged with tension. The contrast illustrates how the face can embody both worldly authority and mystical intensity within a few decades of artistic evolution.

Faces became stages for drama in the Baroque period. In Artemisia Gentileschi’s Judith and Her Maidservant (1625), the faces of the women glow against a backdrop of shadow. Judith’s face is tense and focused, her maid’s expression alert. The chiaroscuro heightens the drama, giving each face a sense of resolve and depth. At the same time, Velázquez’s Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1650) strips away idealization. The pope’s face is sharp, sagging, and suspicious. Velázquez presents authority with ruthless honesty, showing how portraiture could both glorify and unsettle.

By the nineteenth century, portraiture turned inward. Gustave Courbet’s The Desperate Man (1843–45) presents a self-portrait of shock and intensity. His eyes bulge, his hands clutch his head, his face erupts with raw energy. Unlike Bronzino’s serenity or El Greco’s spirituality, Courbet thrusts his private psychology into view. Later in the century, Symbolist painters treated faces as dreamlike visions. Odilon Redon’s Portrait of Violette Heymann (1910) veils the sitter in softness, her features blurred into the atmosphere. Redon transformed the face into an otherworldly presence, half-real and half-imagined.

In the early twentieth century, Paula Modersohn-Becker’s Self-Portrait on Her Sixth Wedding Anniversary (1906) redefined the possibilities of the female face. She painted herself with directness, exposing vulnerability without flattery. The work feels modern because it insists on honesty, rather than idealization. Around the same time, Chaïm Soutine created portraits like Madeleine Castaing (c. 1929), where the face swirls with distortion and color. Soutine’s brushwork breaks the face apart, translating emotion into paint itself. These two artists demonstrate how modernism disrupted conventional portraiture while continuing to obsess over the human face.

Egon Schiele’s Portrait of Wally Neuzil (1912) offers a face that burns with erotic tension. His lines sharpen the features, exaggerating eyes and mouth until they vibrate with intensity. Decades later, Alice Neel brought the same psychological sharpness to her portraits. In her Portrait of Frank O’Hara (1960), the poet’s face appears fragile and reflective. Neel’s brushstrokes carve every feature with precision, presenting a face that carries personal and cultural weight. Both artists demonstrate how faces embody the tension between intimacy and confrontation.

In the late twentieth century, artists continued to reinvent the face of art. Marlene Dumas’s Magdalena (Out of Eggs, Out of Business) (1995) shows a blurred visage that hovers between beauty and unease. Kerry James Marshall’s Untitled (Painter) (2009) presents a powerful Black face embedded in art historical tradition, reclaiming space that has long been denied. Lynette Yiadom-Boakye invents fictional sitters, such as in Any Number of Preoccupations (2010), painting faces that feel timeless and enigmatic. Each example confirms that, even in contemporary art, the face remains central, whether as a presence, an invention, or a political symbol.

From ancient Fayum panels to Yiadom-Boakye’s imagined portraits, the history of painting reveals an enduring obsession with faces. Artists return to the face because it is both universal and personal. It conveys power, faith, desire, memory, and loss. Some faces look out at us with authority, others confront us with fragility or distortion. Across centuries, the face endures as the most direct way for art to address the human condition. By looking beyond the familiar icons, we discover a history of faces that are stranger, deeper, and infinitely more revealing.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2025. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.