Feature image: Francis Bacon’s 7 Reece Mews Studio, London, 1998. Photographed by Perry Ogden, © The Estate of Francis Bacon. All rights reserved, DACS via World of Interiors
The Art of Francis Bacon’s Infamous Chaotic Studio
Francis Bacon worked inside one of the most discussed studios in modern art. The space at 7 Reece Mews in South Kensington became central to his practice from 1961 until his death in 1992. The studio did far more than house paintings and tools. It shaped how Bacon thought, how he looked at images, and how he painted. The room itself became part of the work.
The studio was small, narrow, and densely packed. Paint covered the walls. The floor was filled with torn photographs, books, newspapers, and discarded materials. Canvases leaned against each other. Objects piled up in corners and across walking paths. Bacon felt deeply connected to this environment.
“The images come from the disorder of things rather than from their order.”
The disorder held purpose. The space supported his way of seeing.
Finding 7 Reece Mews
Bacon moved into 7 Reece Mews in 1961. The building was a former coach house located on a quiet London mews. He lived upstairs and worked on the first floor. The studio measured approximately 4 by 6 metres and was illuminated by a skylight above the painting area. The room remained structurally unchanged for more than three decades. Bacon recognized the potential of the space immediately.
“For some reason the moment I saw this place I knew that I could work here.”
The atmosphere mattered more than size or order. He described himself as being influenced by rooms and by the feeling a space created. The studio offered intensity, enclosure, and privacy. These qualities aligned with the kind of concentration his work required.
Chaos as a Working Condition
Visitors often described the studio as overwhelming. Books and magazines are stacked across the floor. Photographs lay crushed underfoot. Pages stuck to walls with paint. Brushes hardened with dried pigment. To Bacon, this environment made sense. He referred to the studio as an example of “ordered chaos.”
The chaos served a practical role. Bacon relied heavily on photographic sources. He collected images of people, animals, medical textbooks, film stills, and reproductions of artworks. These images acted as starting points rather than templates. By keeping them scattered and layered, Bacon allowed chance encounters to occur. He might notice an image at an unexpected angle or find a fragment that triggered a new idea.
“It is much easier for me to paint in a place like this which is a mess. I do not know why but it helps me.”
The disorder created visual pressure. It surrounded him with stimuli and encouraged the formation of associations freely. The studio supported movement between memory, sensation, and paint.
Living Inside the Studio
The studio formed part of Bacon’s daily life. He cooked, slept, and bathed in the same building. The close proximity of living and working spaces collapsed the boundary between routine and creation. Friends and assistants recalled that Bacon moved comfortably through the clutter. He knew where things were, even when others struggled to step across the floor.
The studio was also a private space. Bacon allowed few people inside. He guarded the environment because it supported his concentration. The objects within it held personal meaning and visual importance. Photographs showed signs of repeated handling. Pages folded, torn, and stained over time. The studio carried traces of his thinking across decades.
The walls themselves became surfaces of record. Paint marks accumulated. Images were pinned and removed; left shadows and residue were removed. The studio changed constantly through use rather than through cleaning or reorganization.
After Bacon’s Death
When Bacon died in 1992, the studio remained intact. Everything stayed exactly as he left it. This decision preserved a rare opportunity to understand the physical conditions of his practice. In 1998, the contents of the studio were donated to Dublin City Gallery, The Hugh Lane.
The relocation involved a careful process. Specialists catalogued every object. They recorded positions, measurements, and materials. The walls, floor, ceiling, and door were dismantled and reconstructed. More than seven thousand individual item swere moved from London to Dublin. In 2001, the studio reopened as a permanent installation.
The reconstructed studio presents the space as it existed during Bacon’s lifetime. Visitors see the density of materials and the intensity of surfaces. The studio functions as both archive and artifact. It provides insight into how Bacon worked and how he surrounded himself with images.
The Studio as an Image System
Seeing the studio in its preserved form reveals how deeply Bacon relied on accumulation. The space acted as a visual system rather than a container. Objects interacted with each other. Photographs overlapped. Text mixed with image. Paint covered everything.
This system parallels Bacon’s paintings. His figures often emerge from layered fields. Forms distort and reform. Backgrounds press inward. The studio offered a physical version of this process. It surrounded Bacon with fragments that encouraged transformation rather than replication.
The studio also highlights the role of chance. Images appeared unexpectedly. A photograph half buried beneath papers might catch his eye. A torn page might suggest a new contour or movement. The environment supported discovery rather than planning.
Rethinking Creative Space
Bacon’s studio challenges common ideas about artistic space. Many studios emphasize clarity, light, and control. Bacon’s space emphasized density, pressure, and accumulation. It suggests that creativity can thrive within overload and repetition.
The preservation of the studio invites broader questions. How does space shape thought? How does the environment influence attention? How do artists build systems that support their way of working?
Bacon’s studio stands as a physical record of these questions. It shows that the conditions of making matter deeply. The room became an extension of Bacon’s mind and method.
Understanding the studio as part of the work opens new ways of thinking about artistic process. It shifts focus from finished paintings to the environments that allow images to emerge. The studio at 7 Reece Mews remains one of the most revealing spaces in modern art because it shows how chaos can function as structure and how space itself can become a creative force.
©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2026. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.
All archival images in this article are used under fair use for educational and non-commercial purposes. Proper credit has been given to photographers, archives, and original sources where known.
