The Garden Paintings Art History Hasn't Talked About Enough

Feature image: Gerda Wegener, Venus and Amor, 1930 via Obelisk Art History 

The garden has long been one of the most loaded spaces in Western art, a site of paradise and temptation, of bodies at leisure and nature barely contained. But the conversation tends to begin and end in the same place: Monet at Giverny, Pissarro and Klimt’s garden series, Van Gogh's French institution grounds, and especially Bosch's Garden of Earthly Delights.

These are extraordinary works, and they have been written about extensively enough to stand on their own. What they obscure is a far stranger, more unsettling, and more fascinating body of garden painting that stretches from the forests of the German Renaissance to the alchemical dreamscapes of mid-century Mexico. The paintings collected here span movements and nationalities, united in their treatment of ritual and nature as symbol. This is the garden painting that art history has not yet written enough about.

Lucas Cranach the Elder painted the moment of transgression in the Garden of Eden at least thirty times across his career, returning to it with an obsessiveness that is itself worth examining. The 1526 version held at the Courtauld Gallery in London is among his most refined. What makes this painting the first great garden painting is not the theological drama but the setting Cranach constructs around it: a dense, lush forest clearing populated with a carefully observed menagerie of animals arranged with an attention to the natural world that runs parallel to the spiritual narrative rather than subordinating itself to it. The garden here is simultaneously the paradise about to be lost and a study of the vitality of the world it contains. Cranach likely painted this version in connection with a commission related to the future Elector Johann Frederick, possibly on the occasion of his marriage in 1527, which gives the image of two naked bodies in a garden an additional charge it does not typically receive.

Evelyn De Morgan painted The Garden of Opportunity in Florence in 1892, during one of the six-month residencies she kept there throughout that period of her life. The painting was never exhibited in her lifetime, and it remained in the De Morgan family home in Florence until their final visit in 1914. The garden acts as a moral arena, a space where the choice between knowledge and easy pleasure unfolds in real time. De Morgan, who fought throughout her career to be taken seriously in a Victorian art world that preferred women silent, built her feminist convictions directly into the landscape. The painting's flatness and bold color, which set it apart from her earlier Pre-Raphaelite work, reflect the influence of the Italian Renaissance panel paintings she was studying while living in Florence. It was never shown. It was not meant for an audience she expected to understand it.

Frederick Carl Frieseke spent most of his working life as an expatriate in France, and his Giverny garden and its circular pool appear in a series of paintings from 1912 and 1913 that belong to the most productive and commercially successful period of his career. In early 1912, Frieseke received his first solo exhibition at New York's Macbeth Gallery and was elected to the National Academy, before a studio fire in December of that year destroyed as many as thirty canvases. He and his wife spent the following months in Corsica, and when he returned to the garden at Giverny, he painted it as a series: the pool ringed first with hollyhocks, then with nasturtiums, the model's dress changing, the light intensifying. The Garden Pool is the first iteration. A woman hovers over the edge of the circular pool, the garden pressing in from every angle, the water's surface reflecting color and light in Frieseke's signature broken brushwork. He won the Temple Gold Medal from the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts in 1913 and the Grand Prize at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition in 1915. Despite this, his name rarely appears in surveys of Impressionism that are not specifically focused on the American variant.

Charles Mahoney exhibited Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden at the New English Art Club in 1936, the same year William Rothenstein listed him alongside Henry Moore as one of the Royal College of Art's finest students. The painting was purchased from Mahoney directly by John Rothenstein for the Contemporary Art Society in 1941 and presented to the Tate Gallery the following year, where it has remained. Mahoney was a skilled botanist, and the garden's vegetation is rendered with the specificity of illustration rather than the looseness of painting. Mahoney's first depictions of Adam and Eve date to the beginning of his relationship with Evelyn Dunbar, and references to "Charlie and Eve" appear throughout their correspondence from this period, which gives the two nude figures in the garden a biographical charge the Tate's label does not mention. Despite featuring prominently in Tate Britain's The Art of the Garden exhibition in 2005, Mahoney remains one of the least discussed painters of his generation.

Joaquin Sorolla designed the garden of his Madrid home, now the Museo Sorolla, as an extension of his practice: an Andalusian-inflected space of columns, Moorish tilework, and fountains that he treated as both subject and studio. He painted it throughout the final years of his life, producing a series of canvases that capture the garden in different lights and seasons, including Jardin de la Casa Sorolla, completed between 1918 and 1920 and now held by the Museo Sorolla. This photograph, taken by Arthur Byne in 1920, shows Sorolla at work in that same garden. In June of that year, while painting in the garden, he suffered a massive stroke from which he never recovered. One of his final finished works depicts the empty wicker chair where he used to sit to paint, which reads now as something close to a self-portrait without a figure. Monet once described Sorolla as the master of light. Sorolla considered himself closer in spirit to Sargent and Whistler. Neither description quite accounts for the intimacy of the garden paintings, which occupy a different register from his large beach scenes and public commissions.

Remedios Varo had been an active member of the Paris Surrealist circle since the mid-1930s, and her arrival in Mexico in 1941 transformed her practice in ways that Paris had not anticipated. By 1951, when she painted Garden of Love, she was producing work that fused Surrealist imagery with medieval iconography, alchemical symbolism, Mayan visual culture, and a precise, nearly miniaturist technique developed from her study of Flemish and Renaissance panel painting. The garden in this work is not a garden in any recognizable sense. It is a constructed symbolic space, a forest clearing where a bird-headed figure in courtly dress approaches a marble woman reaching from a tower window. The depiction of this garden emphasizes precision of illustration rather than the looseness of nature. Garden of Love belongs to the period just before Varo devoted herself entirely to painting in 1953, when her practice was still finding its footing in a new country and a new visual language.

When Leonora Carrington painted The Garden of Paracelsus, she had been working in Mexico for fourteen years and had absorbed Mayan visual culture, the Kabbalah, tarot, alchemy, and Celtic mythology. The Garden of Paracelsus takes its title from the sixteenth-century Swiss physician and alchemist who proposed that the philosopher's stone could be found in nature itself. Carrington populates the canvas with androgynous figures engaged in ceremonial activity in a garden that is neither naturalistic nor legible by conventional art historical standards. The Hanged Man of the tarot, a figure Carrington returned to throughout her career, appears in the composition. Carrington died in Mexico City in 2011, and The Garden of Paracelsus made a record sale at Sotheby's New York in 2022 for $3.2 million.

What connects these painters is a shared conviction that the garden is not a neutral subject. In 2025, the Venice Biennale centered Carrington's work as its conceptual anchor, and the market for female Surrealists has not slowed since. The garden, it turns out, was never finished.

More deep dives into the art history you haven't read yet land every week in Letter from the Publisher, ArtRKL's free weekly newsletter for subscribers.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2026. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.