The Power of Motion: Artists Who Embraced Action Painting

Feature image: Yoko Ono, Cut Piece via Singulart

Action painting places energy, movement, and spontaneity at the center of the artistic process. The term came into focus in the 1940s and 50s, especially in New York. Art critic Harold Rosenberg famously wrote that for these artists, “what was to go on the canvas was not a picture but an event.” The canvas became an arena, not a surface. Action painting rejected careful planning and embraced gesture, chance, and the raw physicality of the act.

Although rooted in Abstract Expressionism, the principles of action painting reached across continents and mediums. Some used brushes the size of brooms. Others hurled pigment, danced across canvas, or even cut into cloth. These artists shared one aim: to record the act itself as art.

Jackson Pollock revolutionized the idea of painting by stepping off the easel. He placed his canvases on the ground and moved around them, dripping and flinging paint from above. His technique became known as “drip painting,” but the deeper innovation was his emphasis on gesture and gravity.

Pollock’s Autumn Rhythm (Number 30) remains a landmark of this style. It captures the rhythm of his body and the layering of time. Pollock once said, “I want to express my feelings rather than illustrate them.” This marked a shift from painting as image to painting as presence. The result feels spontaneous, but also meditative and intentional.

Franz Kline developed a more minimalist but no less powerful form of action painting. His iconic black-and-white works reflect broad, sweeping brushstrokes laid down with immediacy and conviction. Kline often painted on enormous canvases using commercial brushes and house paint. The result was architectural, almost calligraphic.

Works like Painting Number 2 show an intense relationship between motion and composition. Kline’s paintings do not portray scenes or people. Instead, they present raw momentum. Every brushstroke holds weight. Every decision appears final.

Willem de Kooning’s style combined physical vigor with intense emotional layering. His Woman series blends recognizable forms with abstraction, producing figures that appear to vibrate with motion. De Kooning painted and repainted his canvases, scraping them down and building them up again.

Unlike Pollock or Kline, de Kooning held onto the figure as a subject. Yet he treated the figure as something to confront, not admire. His physical engagement with the medium often created a sense of turmoil and transformation. His work is both bodily and painterly. Every inch reflects labor and immediacy.

In Japan, artist Kazuo Shiraga transformed action painting through his body. A founding member of the Gutai Art Association, Shiraga painted by suspending himself from ropes and using his feet to manipulate pigment across canvas. This method removed the hand from the process entirely and turned painting into a full-body event.

His piece Challenging Mud featured the artist rolling, kicking, and wrestling with piles of wet clay. Shiraga believed in the beauty of the unplanned, the raw. His work captured movement in the purest form. Painting became a fight with the medium, a record of tension and release.

Shozo Shimamoto, also of the Gutai group, developed a technique involving the explosive release of paint-filled bottles onto canvas. These actions produced splashes and cracks that could not be replicated. The unpredictability was essential. Each work became a time-stamped record of one irreproducible moment.

Shimamoto’s practice shows how action painting can involve destruction as well as creation. In pieces like Cannon Work, he literally used small cannons to launch pigment. The result was vibrant and aggressive. He framed chaos as beauty.

Yoko Ono reshaped the concept of action painting by replacing the brush with instruction and interaction. Her 1964 performance, Cut Piece, invited the audience to approach her on stage and cut away parts of her clothing. The act was intimate, tense, and unpredictable. Ono’s body became both the subject and the canvas.

Ono also composed “event scores, ”brief written instructions that directed small actions, like imagining clouds or listening to silence. These pieces offered a gentler form of action, but still centered on the present moment. Her art erased the line between thinking and doing. Ono expanded the idea of gesture beyond paint, bringing it into real life.

Austrian artist Hermann Nitsch developed a radical form of action painting through what he called “Orgien Mysterien Theater.” These performances often involved blood, fabric, and ritualistic gestures. Nitsch poured and smeared paint (and other substances) across canvases in theatrical spectacles that felt religious in tone and scale.

Nitsch treated painting as a multisensory event. Viewers witnessed, smelled, and even walked through the aftermath. His large canvases, stained and torn, carried the physical residue of the action. He saw art as an experience to be lived, not observed. The body was the tool. The gesture was sacred.

Although often associated with the 1950s and 60s, the ideas behind action painting continue to influence art today. Contemporary artists explore movement, touch, and physicality in countless ways. The canvas remains a site for gesture, but so does the street, the body, the screen, and the stage.

Performance artists, installation artists, and even digital artists all carry forward the belief that art exists in action. What unites these practices is the presence of the body and the belief that process holds meaning equal to product.

From Pollock’s drips to Ono’s silent invitations, action artists remind us that making art can be a radical act of presence. The marks on the surface reflect not just the artist’s hand, but their entire being in motion.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2025. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.

All archival images in this article are used under fair use for educational and non-commercial purposes. Proper credit has been given to photographers, archives, and original sources where known.