Three Klimt Masterpieces, Rejected by Vienna, Erased by Fire

Feature image: Gustav Klimt, Faculty Paintings, 1900-1907 via Wikimedia Commons

Some paintings change an artist's career simply by existing. Gustav Klimt's Faculty Paintings did it twice, first by scandalizing the city that commissioned them, and then by disappearing so completely that they exist today only as black-and-white photographs and a handful of preparatory studies. The story runs through professional rejection, forced repurchase, wartime theft, and a fire in the last days of World War II, and it ends with three of Klimt's most ambitious works reduced to memory.

In 1894, the University of Vienna commissioned Klimt and his contemporary Franz Matsch to decorate the ceiling of the Great Hall in a new assembly building on the Ringstrasse. The brief called for allegorical celebrations of the university's leading faculties, and Klimt was assigned three: Philosophy, Medicine, and Jurisprudence. Matsch's early designs for the central ceiling image were well received. Klimt's approach, when he first presented it, seemed to fit the same conventional mold. Then his style changed, dramatically and irreversibly, over the years he spent actually painting the commission.

Klimt unveiled Philosophy at the Vienna Secession's tenth exhibition in 1901. Rather than a triumphant image of human reason, the painting presented a drifting, half-visible procession of nude figures suspended in a cosmic haze, with a sphinx-like head emerging from the darkness below. It read as uncertainty rather than mastery, and Vienna's academic establishment recoiled. Eighty-seven university faculty members signed a petition against it, and critics accused Klimt of producing something closer to pornography than allegory.

Medicine, which followed, provoked an even sharper reaction. Klimt centered the composition on Hygieia, the Greek goddess of health, surrounded by a river of nude bodies representing birth, suffering, and death. Rather than celebrating medicine's triumphs, the painting insisted on the limits of the field, on the fact that healing could not defeat mortality. A medical journal attacked it directly, and university faculty lodged a formal complaint. Jurisprudence closed out the trio with similarly unflattering allegorical figures, and by the time all three were finished, the university had made its position clear: none of the paintings would be installed.

By 1905, Klimt had had enough. With financial backing from his patron August Lederer, a wealthy Jewish industrialist and one of his most important collectors, Klimt repaid the university's commission fee in full and reclaimed all three paintings as his own property. It was an unusual reversal, an artist buying back a rejected public commission rather than seeing it forcibly altered or shelved, and it marked a turning point in Klimt's career. He moved decisively away from public and academic commissions afterward, toward private patrons and the more decorative, gold-inflected style that would define his most famous later work.

The Faculty Paintings passed into the Lederer family's private collection, where they were occasionally exhibited, including in a 1928 show marking the tenth anniversary of Klimt's death. For roughly three decades, they existed as celebrated but contested works, admired by some, still dismissed by others, and privately owned rather than publicly displayed.

That private ownership did not protect the paintings for long. After the Nazi annexation of Austria in 1938, August Lederer's family was dispossessed under Aryanization laws, and the Faculty Paintings were seized along with the rest of their Klimt holdings. In 1943, the Reichsstatthalter in Vienna ordered a public exhibition of the confiscated works at the Vienna Secession. From there, the paintings were moved to Schloss Immendorf, a castle roughly 31 miles northwest of Vienna, a location the Nazis apparently believed was safe from the fighting.

It was not. In the first days of May 1945, as Soviet forces closed in and Germany's surrender became imminent, retreating SS troops set fire to the castle, reportedly to keep its contents from falling into Soviet hands. All three Faculty Paintings were destroyed, along with a substantial number of other Klimt works that had been part of the Lederer collection, including the 1916 portrait Wally. The exact number of paintings lost in the fire has never been fully established.

Not every Klimt work stored nearby met the same fate. Goldfish, a painting that had drawn its own share of controversy when it debuted in 1901, survived and is now held at the Kunstmuseum Solothurn in Switzerland, a rare instance of a scandal-plagued Klimt work outliving the war intact while its more famous companions did not.

What remains of the Faculty Paintings today is almost entirely secondhand. A small number of black-and-white photographs, taken before the works were destroyed, are the only direct visual record, supplemented by preparatory sketches and studies that Klimt produced while developing the compositions. The Leopold Museum in Vienna displays full-scale photographic reproductions, and the Österreichische Galerie Belvedere holds surviving studies related to the series.

In 2021, Google Arts & Culture and the Belvedere collaborated on an effort to bring color back to those photographs. Google engineer Emil Wallner spent nearly six months developing an AI model trained on contemporary written descriptions of the paintings, roughly a million images of the physical world, and eighty full-color reproductions of Klimt's other paintings from the same period, using that data to generate a color approximation of what the black-and-white photographs had lost. The results are informed speculation rather than restoration, since no one now living has seen the originals in color, but they represent one of the more serious attempts to give the Faculty Paintings back some version of their visual life.

The Faculty Paintings occupy an unusual place in art history: famous largely for the reaction they provoked and the loss that followed, rather than for direct experience of the works themselves. Klimt's decision to buy them back rather than let the university dictate their fate reshaped the rest of his career, and the fire that destroyed them decades later turned that reshaping into the only version of the story anyone can now fully verify. What's left is argument, photograph, and guesswork, which may be the most honest way any lost masterpiece can survive.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2026. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.

More artist tributes and deep dives land every week in Letter from the Publisher, ArtRKL's free weekly newsletter for subscribers.