Philip Guston: Figuration, Fear, and Moral Reckoning

Feature image: Philip Guston, Flatlands, 1970 © The Estate of Philip Guston via SFMOMA

Philip Guston’s career was one of radical reinvention. Guston defied artistic norms and expectations from his early days, influenced by Mexican muralists, to his rise within Abstract Expressionism, to his shocking return to figuration. His later works were cartoonish, grotesque, and deeply symbolic, and they faced fierce criticism. Still, they ultimately cemented his legacy as a visionary who used paint to confront injustice, anxiety, and personal trauma. This article explores Guston’s life, visual language, and political conscience, unpacking how his art remains disturbingly relevant today.

Philip Guston was born in 1913 in Montreal to Ukrainian Jewish immigrants and moved to Los Angeles as a child. The trauma of his father’s suicide, paired with the rise of American racism and antisemitism, shaped his early worldview. He began drawing in secret and was expelled from high school for publishing politically charged cartoons.

Influenced by Mexican muralists like José Clemente Orozco and David Alfaro Siqueiros, Guston embraced art as a tool of narrative and conscience. He worked on murals and aligned himself with socially engaged art. However, by the 1950s, he shifted into lyrical abstraction, joining the ranks of Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock as part of the New York School. They believed in abstraction's emotional and spiritual potential, and Guston, like Rothko, sought to evoke introspective states through color and form.

Guston and Rothko, in particular, had an intellectual connection. Both were of Jewish heritage, wrestled with existential questions in their art, and were critical of the commercialization of the art world. Guston even helped Rothko secure his first major mural commission at the Seagram Building, though Rothko famously walked away from it.

Pollock, on the other hand, represented the movement’s wild intensity. Guston admired Pollock's energy but kept a more contemplative, painterly approach in his early abstractions.

In 1970, Guston unveiled an entirely new body of work at Marlborough Gallery: strange, cartoon-like paintings of hooded figures, lightbulbs, shoes, and bare lightbulbs dangling over dystopian rooms. Critics were horrified. The New York Times called it "an embarrassment." Many of his peers turned away. 

Rothko reportedly felt betrayed by Guston’s turn away from what they had built together. Guston was devastated by Rothko’s reaction, especially since Rothko took his own life later that year. Guston’s shift marked the loss of friendship, community, and shared vision.

Yet this was no impulsive shift. Guston had grown frustrated with abstraction, which he felt lacked the moral urgency of the moment. He wanted to confront, not escape, the chaos outside.

The most jarring motif in Guston’s late work is the recurring image of hooded figures resembling the Ku Klux Klan. But these are not glorifications, they are grotesque self-portraits. Guston saw the hoods as symbols of complicity, cowardice, and self-loathing.

He inserted himself into the scenes as a hooded figure painting in a studio, driving a car, or smoking a cigarette. The cigarette itself became a kind of existential punctuation, a sign of paralysis, of futility.

Other symbols such as shoes, clocks, bricks, and eyeballs populated his canvases. These everyday objects became loaded with tension and ambiguity, transformed into tools of memory, guilt, and critique.

As political tensions in America escalated during the late 1960s and early 1970s, with the Vietnam War, civil unrest, and the rise of President Richard Nixon, Guston responded with a body of satirical drawings that pushed his work into even more confrontational territory. In these works, he portrayed Nixon with a giant phallus nose, grotesque jowls, and hunched postures. The images were vulgar, cartoonish, and scathing, blurring the line between political cartoon and fine art.

Yet Guston resisted being called a satirist. "I want to go to the core of something," he said. His images were not just commentary, they were confessionals. Guston saw art as an act of responsibility.

This sense of moral urgency made his work difficult but unforgettable. It also made it controversial, especially in 2020, when a major retrospective of his work was postponed over concerns about the hooded figures. The delay sparked a debate about censorship, context, and the role of discomfort in art.

 One of Guston’s most infamous paintings, The Studio, shows a hooded figure, a clear Klan reference, painting a self-portrait. This chilling image blurs the line between artist and perpetrator. Guston implicates himself in the systems of violence he critiques. It’s a brutally honest acknowledgment that no one, not even the artist, is innocent. The pink, fleshy palette and sparse furnishings amplify the psychological weight of the scene.

This work is a grotesque caricature of artistic paralysis. A giant disembodied head smokes and munches while surrounded by cigarette butts and floating debris. It is both humorous and bleak. The gluttonous imagery can be read as self-loathing, depicting artistic burnout, or even critiquing creative indulgence. Guston offers no resolution, just an image of overwhelmed inertia.

In City Limits, hooded figures drive a small car through a desolate, abstracted landscape. The pink sky, cartoonish tires, and ambiguous direction raise questions: Are they fleeing? Patrolling? Wandering? Again, Guston paints the perpetrators of violence not with grandeur, but with absurdity. This disarms and disturbs the viewer. The painting becomes a meditation on complicity, banality, and blindness.

Guston’s later work is often called ugly, crude, even childlike. But that rawness is the point. He abandoned the elegance of abstraction in favor of something more vulnerable and intimate.

His distorted forms, cartoonish eyes, and fleshy pinks confront viewers with imperfection. They reflect the artist’s internal war of doubt, complicity, and being human.

In embracing the grotesque, Guston paved the way for later painters like Dana Schutz and Raymond Pettibon, who use distortion and discomfort to speak emotional truth.

Once ridiculed, Guston is now hailed as a prophet. His art anticipated today’s moral ambiguity, political rage, and inner fragmentation. He showed that paint could carry both philosophical weight and biting humor.

His willingness to implicate himself, to depict the enemy within, makes his work enduringly influential.

In a time when many artists chase aesthetic perfection or social approval, Guston remains a reminder that the most courageous art is often the messiest.

We highly recommend watching Michael Blackwood's documentary, Philip Guston A Life Lived, an intimate film that offers rare footage of the artist in his studio, reflecting on his creative process, doubts, and lifelong search for meaning. Watch here.

©ArtRKL® LLC 2021-2025. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. ArtRKL® and its underscore design indicate trademarks of ArtRKL® LLC and its subsidiaries.